Tagged “victims”
Steven Sitler: Defense Clarifications
The defense does not agree with portions of the Sex-Offender Assessment Group Summary (“SOAG”) dated February 13, 2006, and signed by Brad Lutz, and portions of the Addendum to the Presentence Investigation (“APSI”) dated February 15, 2006, and signed by Naomi L. Laurino (hereinafter: “the NICI document”). . . .
Steven Sitler: “Minister’s Report” to the Parish Heads of Households Meeting
The last item concerns a young man that many of you know — Steven Sitler. He was in our community last year, although not as a member of our church. He was recently sentenced (justly) to jail for sexual molestation of young children, including some in our congregation. One of the victim families involved was that of. . . .
Douglas Wilson to Judge Stegner: “I have been asked to provide a letter on behalf of Steven Sitler, which I am happy to do.”
I am grateful that he will be sentenced for his behavior, and that there will be hard consequences for him in real time. At the same time, I would urge that the civil penalties applied would be measured and limited. I have a good hope that Steven has genuinely repented, and that he will continue to deal with this to become a productive and contributing member of society.
Steven Sitler: Criminal Information
Steven Sitler: Confirmation of Rule 11 Plea Agreement
Steven Sitler: Criminal Complaint
That the Defendant, STEVEN JAMES SITLER, between the months of September, 2003, and March, 2005, in the County of Latah, State of Idaho, did unlawfully commit acts of manual-genital and genital-genital contact or other lewd and lascivious acts upon or with the body of . . . a minor female child . . . all done with the intent to arouse, appeal to, or gratify the lust, passions, or sexual desires. . . .
Steven Sitler: Written Statement by the Victim Father for Latah County Sheriff’s Office
Blog & Mablog: “The B.T.K. Killer and the Objectivity of the Covenant”
The recent arrest of Dennis Rader for the infamous B.T.K. killings presents an interesting dilemma for those who want to maintain, as I do, the objectivity of the covenant. For the sake of this discussion, I want to assume that the reports are true that Rader has confessed to a number of the killings, and that Rader is in fact guilty. If that were not the case, then our discussion should revolve around rules of evidence, and what constitutes proof. . . .